Buyer Beware

If you have a laissez-faire disposition about politics regarding the upcoming 2008 presidential election, and are contemplating voting for any of the current batch of Democratic hopefuls, especially Hillary Clinton, John Edwards, or Barack Obama, you need to know what you are buying into. I will focus on these three because they are the Democratic front runners and the most dangerous. These are not your father’s Democrats.

If you want to know what you are securing for your vote, you should read the Communist Manifesto by Carl Marx. After that you will know exactly you are getting for your vote.

Hillary Clinton is a Marxist. John Edward doesn’t know what he is, but is bumbling around with his compass pointed towards Marxism. Barack Obama will have to follow a Fascist agenda if he wants to appease the far-left bloggers,media, and the fringe groups that control the Democratic party.

It doesn’t matter what party one is affiliated with or shares the fundamentals of, rhetoric and actions will always define one’s character. Hillary Clinton has been defined as a Marxist. Same with John Edwards. Barack Obama is in the ballpark of Socialism, but will be compelled to change his spots if he is to front a serious challenge to the other pinkos.

If you dismiss the consequences of who is elected in 2008, then re-consider. This is an election where the consequences have the potential to be cataclysmic to the basic fundamentals this country was founded upon.

If Hillary Clinton or an equal is elected, this is what to expect: Socialist will have control of the Legislative branch and the Executive branch. Benign at first. They have the immediate potential to do perdurable damage but the current Supreme Court, in its current state, would most likely temper steps over constitutional boundaries. ‘

The makeup of the Supreme Court has the potential the change acutely during the next administration. There will be at least one and maybe two appointments to the Supreme Court during the administration following the 2008 elections. The court has four solid conservatives on the bench. There are currently a hodgepodge of Socialist loons in control of the Congress. Add a Socialist to the Presidency then deduce what persuasion of justice or justices will be nominated and possibly appointed to the Supreme Court? It is plausible that all three branches of the government could be under Socialist control.

Where could it go from there? Hugo Chavez ran as a Socialist in Valenzuela. He was overwhelmingly elected. After being elected and appointing himself President for life he nationalized (appropriated without compensation) the energy sectors with the intention of redistributing the wealth. Then he nationalized (appropriated without compensation) the utility companies with the same intentions. No problem. Peter has been robbed and Paul paid in full- the foundation of Socialism. Earlier this week Chavez nationalized a popular television station. Then the riots started. Too bad. Now we have a dictator and not of the benevolent class. Nothing can be done short of a coup or assassination to change current Venezuelan policies. The people of Valenzuela made a deal with the devil and are paying the same price as any one who makes a deal with the devil.

A few days later Evo Morales, President of Bolivia and Rafael Correa, President of Ecuador, have taken steps to restrict freedoms of the press in their respective countries by cracking down on independent broadcasters. This was with the encouragement of Hugo Chavez’s buddy Fidel Castro.

If you think the socialist agenda of wealth and property redistribution and the nationalizing of private companies will make your life better, then vote for Hilliary Clinton or someone similar. You will be making a deal with the devil….but do you want to pay that price?

Immigration Bill

“I’d rather entrust the government of the United States to the first 400 people listed in the Boston telephone directory than to the faculty of Harvard University.”
–William F. Buckley

Bush Attacks immigration Deal Opponents

May 29 12:53 PM US/Eastern

Associated Press Writer

President Bush attacked opponents of an immigration deal Tuesday, suggesting they “don’t want to do what’s right for America.” “The fundamental question is, will elected officials have the courage necessary to put a comprehensive immigration plan in place,” Bush said against a backdrop of a huge American flag. He described his proposal—which has been agreed to by a bipartisan group of senators—as one that “makes it more likely we can enforce our border—and at the same time uphold the great immigrant tradition of the United States of America.”

“A lot of Americans are skeptical about immigration reform, primarily because they don’t think the government can fix the problems,” Bush said. “Those determined to find fault with this bill will always be able to look at a narrow slice of it and find something they don’t like,” the president said. “If you want to kill the bill, if you don’t want to do what’s right for America, you can pick one little aspect out of it.

You really have to concentrate on being stupid to be this stupid. It would be impossible to accomplish this without assistance. You would need a cabinet.

Sure Bush was educated at Yale and Harvard, but that does not guarantee intelligence. I could fill pages with people with degrees from Ivy League universities who are stupid.

Never assume that education will render someone intelligent; never assume someone that is intelligent has common sense; never assume someone without a formal education lacks intelligence or common sense.

Just because an educator can embed information and facts inside someone’s head and that person in turn can duplicate it on a test, does not mean they have the cognitive capability to assimilate the information into anything remotely intelligent, useful or functional.

I have to assume Bush either did not read the bill that the Senate is currently debating or was incapable of reading and comprehending it’s meaning. Maybe there weren’t enough pictures in it. The bill is one of the absolute worst pieces of legislation to be debated in Congress.

I could break Bush’s statements down but the stupidity is self declamatory.

Memorial Day

Today is Memorial Day, formally known as Decoration Day. Most people have no idea what it represents. To most it is just a three day holiday that means you can wear white pants now.

Decoration Day started before the end of the civil war to honor the soldiers who died. It was started in the South by women’s groups who were decorating the graves of Confederate soldiers. The North followed suit and started their own Decoration Day. After WWII it continued on to honor all soldiers who where killed in battle. In 1967 the federal government officially unified the holiday into Memorial Day.

Sometimes things of this magnitude transcend individuals and whole cities can become exceedingly patriotic. Lets give just due where it is deserved during this special holiday.

San Fransisco is the champion. Lets take a look at their patriotism and how they honor the soldiers who have fought for their freedom to be idiots and the densely bastion of anti-American leeches they have become.

The USS Iowa fought in battles from WWII to Korea to the Persian Gulf. The battle ship is retired and headed to the San Fransisco Fisherman’s Wharf to be permanently docked as a museum. But city supervisors voted 8-3 against the ship being docked in their bay. Citing local opposition to the military’s stance on gays in the military and their opposition to the Iraqi war.

The San Fransisco City Public School Board voted to eliminate the Army and Navy Junior ROTC programs from the city’s high schools which 1,600 students participate. They did this because they don’t agree with the military’s’ “don’t ask don’t tell” policy.

And the most offensive of all: Gerardo Sandoval, a city supervisor, stated that the “United States should not have a military. All in all we would be in better shape if we never had one”. A city supervisor is equivalent to a city councilman.

He was asked what if the nation were attacked? How would we handle it? He replied, “There is nothing that could happen to this country that the police and fire departments could not handle.”

It doesn’t take much to realize that not only are there people but entire cities that are not worthy to be in this country. The city of San Fransisco does not deserve to belong to this country. Yes you can blame the entire city because they elect these anarchist. These people actually do represent the people.

If you are not that well informed about Nancy Pelosi or have just heard here name here and there but have yet to connect all the dots, these are the people who elected her. These are her constituents. If she wavers too far from their from their agenda, she will not be reelected and she knows it.

Have a great Memorial Day San Fransisco honoring the very people who have fought to allow you to become the cesspool you are.

Everyone Likes a Bargain

If you enjoy acquiring items on the cheap, fortune has smiled on you. You can get all the ignorant, uncouth and illiterate babble on a wholesale level just by watching The View.

To hear these nitwitted windbags talk about 9/11 and the Iraqi war or any serious subject matter is akin to listening to preschoolers debate quantum physics. I apologize in advance to any preschoolers I may have offended by the comparison.

And if you want the buy one get one free deal, just read Rosie O’Donnell’s blog. Guaranteed to leave you marginally stupid, depending on how smart you were to start with, for at least 45 minutes. And if you read the comments of her supporters, you can add another 45 minutes to it. Rosie O’Donnell truly is the apostle of the ignorant.

And if you genuinely want to super size it, just read the immigration bill that is presently in the Senate that President Bush is trying to force feed the American public. It may not leave you stupid but will at the very least leave you in a state of bewilderment. It will make you wonder if rather than a dirty bomb, a stupid bomb was detonated inside the Beltway.

Bill Clinton has been called the first black President of United States. George Bush is certainly determined to become the first Mexican President of the United States.

Not If But When

To harbor an idea that the United States will never experience suicide, homicide or any other fashion of bombings such that the Middle East experiences is categorically naive. It can’t be more than a theoretical probability that it won’t happen.

With the way our politicians have treated immigration and national security, which are not mutually exclusive, you would be an idiot to think it could not happen.

If you have had a caviler attitude about whether or not this could happen read the results of this poll.

Homicide Bombings Against Civilians

Wednesday, May 23, 2007

Fox News

WASHINGTON — One out of four young U.S. Muslims believe homicide bombings against civilians are OK to “defend Islam,” according to a new poll.

The poll by the Pew Research Center also finds some Muslim Americans seem to be separating from mainstream America in their attitudes toward the War on Terror and U.S.


Mideast policy.

The study found that among the nation’s younger Muslims, 26 percent say homicide bombings can at least rarely be justified “in order to defend Islam from its enemies.”

“It is a hair-raising number,” said Radwan Masmoudi, president of the Washington-based Center for the Study of Islam and Democracy, which promotes the compatibility of Islam with democracy.

The poll briefly describes the rationales for and against “suicide bombing and other forms of violence against civilian targets” and then asks, “Do you personally feel that this kind of violence is often justified to defend Islam, sometimes justified, rarely justified, or never justified?”

Younger U.S. Muslims under the age of 30 are much more willing to accept homicide bombing in the defense of Islam than are their older counterparts, the study found. While 69 percent of Muslims under 30 say homicide bombings are never justified, 2 percent say they’re often justified, 13 percent say bombings are sometimes justified and 11 percent say they are rarely justified. Only 9 percent of older U.S. Muslims said homicide attacks are at least rarely justified.

In addition to young Muslims’ attitudes towards homicide bombings, the study found that only 40 percent of U.S. Muslims believe that Arabs carried out the Sept. 11 attacks. Another 28 percent said they don’t believe it.

Since the Sept. 11 attacks, 53 percent said it’s been more difficult to be Muslim in America.

The Pew poll also found that almost half of the nation’s Muslims are more likely to identify themselves as Muslims first and then Americans, with 47 percent placing religious affiliation above nationality.

Three out of four people surveyed said the decision to go to war in Iraq was wrong, and 48 percent said using force in Afghanistan was wrong. Five percent of those surveyed had a “very favorable” or “somewhat favorable” view of Al Qaeda, while 58 percent had a “very unfavorable” opinion of the terror group.

But the study also found that most of the nation’s Muslim community is “largely assimilated, happy with their lives, and moderate with respect to many of the issues that have divided Muslims and Westerners around the world.”

The poll also found that U.S. Muslims reject Islamic extremism by larger margins than do Muslim minorities in Western European countries.

In Pew surveys last year, support in some Muslim countries exceeded 50 percent, while it was considered justifiable by about one in four Muslims in Britain and Spain, and one in three in France.

“We have crazies just like other faiths have them,” said Eide Alawan, who directs interfaith outreach at the Islamic Center of America in Dearborn, Mich., one of the nation’s largest mosques. He said killing innocent people contradicts Islam.

The survey included more than 1,000 of the nation’s estimated 2.35 million Muslims and was conducted in English and several foreign languages.

Andrew Kohut, Pew director, said in an interview that support for the attacks represented “one of the few trouble spots” in the survey.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.



Call a Spade a Spade

I have been pondering about this immigration bill for about a week since the rough draft was unveiled. I was wondering what it truthfully should be called. House Minority Leader John Boehner beat me to the punch for what was floating around in my head for a name:

Boehner: Immigration Bill is “Piece Of Shit”

House Minority Leader John Boehner, speaking to a private gathering of Republican activists last night, called the Senate’s immigration compromise bill a “piece of shit” but said that he had promised President Bush earlier in the day that he would let his teeth be a barrier to such thoughts in public.

Boehner spoke last night at a small reception for the Republican Rapid Responders on Capitol Hill.

“I promised the President today that I wouldn’t say anything bad about … this piece of shit bill,” he said, according to two attendees.

Earlier in the day, Boehner released a statement saying that “The Senate agreement appears to recognize that additional border security measures and more effective immigration law enforcement must come before any other issues are addressed, but I have significant concerns about parts of the Senate proposal — particularly provisions that would reward illegal immigrants who have consistently broken our laws.”

A senior Republican official said yesterday that while the chances of the bill, which opens pathways to citizenship for most of the U.S.’s 12 million illegal immigrants, are “50/50” in the House and that the White House would spend its time lobbying Democrats, rather than Republicans, to achieve a majority.

Yesterday, the Senate beat back an amendment by Sen. Byron Dorgan that would have scrapped the bill’s new guest worker program. The defeat of that effort was interpreted as a sign that a solid majority of Senators are prepared to support the bill’s main tenets, for now.

People Who Live in Glass Houses……

Former President Carter says that the Bush administration is “the worst in history” in regards to international relations. This is the fourth time he has said this. I can understand that. It takes one to know one.

Lets take a look at the revered Jimmy Carter’s presidential legacy along with his own failed foreign policy:

  • Prime interest rates were at 21.5%, the highest in U.S. history.
  • Double digit inflation.
  • Double digit unemployment.
  • Automobile prices increases 72%
  • New house prices increased 67%
  • In 1979 gasoline prices increased 60%
  • The U.S. economy was one of the worst our history.
  • He cut the defense budget by 6 billion dollars.
  • Removed all nuclear weapons from South Korea. (see where that got us today)
  • Cut back troops stationed in South Korea. (ditto above)
  • Granted the Shah temporary asylum in the U.S.
  • In response to the asylum given to the Shah, Iranian militants seized the U.S. embassy in Tehran taking 53 U.S. hostages.
  • Botched a rescue attempt.
  • There was an energy crisis caused by the Carter administration. The Carter administration punished the oil companies with higher taxation and regulation. Then to top it off they took their windfall profits. Thus systematically doing what the Democrats propose to duplicate today.
  • We were losing the cold war with Russia.

Carter was able cram eight years of ineptness into four.

When Reagan took office, the 53 hostages were released on day one.

I wonder why?

By the end of Reagan’s tenure, we won the cold war, there was not an oil shortage, we had one of the strongest economies in U.S. history, our military was second to none, inflation and interest rate were under control. And taxes were dramatically lower.

Carter also went on to say, ” The policy from the White House as been to allocate funds to religious institutions, even those that channel those funds exclusively to their own particular group of believers in a particular religion. ” As a traditional Baptist, I’ve always believed in separation of church and state and honored that premise when I was president, and so have all other presidents, I might say, except this one.”

He is also ignorant of American history concerning past Presidents and the role religion played in their administration and in defining the foundation of this country.

Jimmy Carter is one of the worst presidents in American history. He has broken the unwritten code about discussing current politics, especially criticizing the current President. This along with some of the zany ideas that come out of his mouth, he is categorically, with prejudice, the worst ex-president this country has produced.

Left vs. Right

Jerry Falwell (August 11,1933-May-15, 2007).

I did not always agree with Jerry Falwell’s ideology. I did not always agree with his methodology of Christian conversion. I did not always agree with his interpretation of the Bible. This did not make Jerry Falwell a bad man. It did not make him an evil man. I believe Jerry Falwell was an honorable man. I believe he was a devout man of faith. His passing is nothing to be celebrated by anyone.

No sooner was the death of Jerry Falwell announced than the leftwing screwballs were dancing on his grave-and he wasn’t even in it yet.

Some comments from the noble left:

“Rot in Hell Falwell”

“Uncharitable or not I am sorry his death was not more painful and drawn out. He did not deserve a relatively peaceful, painless and quick death”



“May Pat Robertson and James Dobson be next”

Never before has this country seen a class so devoid of principles, culture and morals. This is a completely soulless group lot, these liberals.

Christopher Hitchens, the poster child of evil, had this to say:

“The discovery of the carcass of Jerry Falwell on the floor of an obscure office in Virginia has almost zero significance, except perhaps for two categories of the species labeled “credulous idiot.” The first such category consists of those who expected Falwell (and themselves) to be bodily raptured out of the biosphere and assumed into the heavens, leaving pilotless planes and driverless trucks and taxis to crash with their innocent victims as collateral damage. This group is so stupid and uncultured that it may perhaps be forgiven. It is so far left behind” that almost its only pleasure is to gloat at the idea of others being abandoned in the same condition.”

Larry Flynt, publisher of Hustler magazine, and Jerry Falwell were arch enemies for many years. This is how nasty it got:Flynt ran a fake ad in his magazine that said Jerry Falwell’s first sexual experience was with his mother. Their case ended up in the Supreme Court on the first amendment right and Flynt won.

Here is what Larry Flynt had to say about Jerry Falwel’s passing:

“The Reverend Jerry Falwell and I were arch enemies for fifteen years. We became involved in a lawsuit concerning First Amendment rights and Hustler magazine. Without question, this was my most important battle – the l988 Hustler Magazine, Inc., v. Jerry Falwell case, where after millions of dollars and much deliberation, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled in my favor.

My mother always told me that no matter how much you dislike a person, when you meet them face to face you will find characteristics about them that you like. Jerry Falwell was a perfect example of that. I hated everything he stood for, but after meeting him in person, years after the trial, Jerry Falwell and I became good friends. He would visit me in California and we would debate together on college campuses. I always appreciated his sincerity even though I knew what he was selling and he knew what I was selling.”

None of the radical left bloggers, who run the Democratic party, or the mainstream media has a trace of the class that Larry Flynt has demonstrated in the passing of Jerry Falwell. Flynt is old school left. He knows how to be civilized when the occasion calls for it. The same can’t be said for the uncivilized left of today.

Majority Doesn’t Always Rule

The will of the people is the only legitimate foundation of any government, and to protect its free expression should be our first object.
Thomas Jefferson


Voters in the Dallas suburb of Farmers Branch approved by a margin of 68 percent to 32 percent a law to prohibit landlord from renting to illegal aliens, making English the official language and allowing police officers to check the immigration status of suspects in custody. That is a higher margin of victory than is required to make an amendment to the United States Constitution.

Hispanic leaders are calling for a boycott of Farmers Branch because of the law.

Isn’t this what the people of Farmers Branch wanted. More bang for the buck-a two way ban.

By having LULAC and MALDEF involved it is pretty much an admission that all the illegal aliens are Mexican. The ordinance only stated illegal immigrants and never mentioned any nationality.

There are lawsuits being filed by opponents of the new law. This law was passed by a 2 to 1 margin and yet opponents are crying that it discriminates and is unfair. Someone need to look up the word democracy in the dictionary. Of course it discriminates. It discriminates against criminals. All laws discriminate against criminals and criminal activity.

Illegal aliens are at the bottom of the food chain in a societal structure. They are here because they either could not make it in their own country, or for more sinister reasons. No group of uneducated, adjusted middle class citizens are going to uproot and sneak into another country illegally. They couldn’t make it in their own country so they come here to burden our society and our social services and resources. These people are the bottom of the pyramid.

What if there was a mass exodus from United States of the uneducated, welfare using, criminal element, unemployed citizenry leaving this country to sneak into another country?

Would we be better off? Absolutely.

Could it ever happen? Absolutely not. The Democrats would build the border fence they refuse to build now so fast there would be a dust cloud for thousands of miles from the construction.

They would build the fence to keep those people in. Without them there would not be a Democratic party.

It’s Bush’s Fault

You can’t make this stuff up. Half of Indiana’s School of dentistry has been caught in a cheating scandal.

Dr. Anne Koerber, an associate professor of dentistry at the University of Illinois at Chicago who has written about the ethics of dental education and is blaming the cheating on George Bush. Like I said you can’t make this stuff up.

Next Page »