Barack Obama is Even Hypocritical as a Socialist

Barack Obama has the acumen and the pugnacious drive to become America’s Hugo Chavez. Please, don’t get the wrong impression from the title of this Leninist discourse, Barack Obama is Even Hypocritical as a Socialist, since this is as endearing a communistic apologetic as I can produce. I am just disappointed in my pal, Barack, for straying from our Marxist beliefs before he wins the election, by a landslide, no less, and can implement our (us on the left) agenda. Don’t think I am being facetious, because I really do luv me some Socialism.

And how about that capitalist pig, Joe the Plumber? Where does he get off literately attacking Barack with racist hate speech. Barack was kind enough, while taking a stroll in Joe the Plumber’s neighborhood, to stop at Joe’s house for some genteel conversation, and WHAM!!!– just like that, Joe is all over him with racist and mean spirited questions about his taxes being raised if he decides to become one of those affluent entrepreneurial plumbers and all. And Joe the Plumber asked about that stupid mantra that you hear from those conservatives about the American Dream, or something stupid like that. The nerve of that Joe the Plumber. Barack told him off though, and quite soundly at that, and I quote from The One: “It’s not that I want to punish your success. I just want to make sure that everybody who is behind you, that they’ve got a chance for success too. My attitude is that if the economy’s good for folks from the bottom up, it’s gonna be good for everybody … I think when you spread the wealth around, it’s good for everybody.”

You see, the idiots of the Right just don’t get it–…“it’s good for everybody.” Even for you, Joe. Spread it around, Joe the Plumber, and watch it trickle up and before you can say impeachment, we will be living in nirvana. Don’t worry about laying off your plumbing assistants, or whatever they are called, because Barack doubled your taxes–according to Joe the Gaffer, that will make you double patriotic. Don’t feel sorry for them, they will be getting a back-end welfare check from Barack’s new tax plan that will cut the taxes of 95% of adults. No job, no taxes paid, no problem, you still get money back. A check just shows up in the mail. So shut-up, Joe, and don’t spoil it for 95% of the country.

Back to my original point of contention with Barack. Here’s the deal: Barack has raised 603 million dollars for his campaign. That is a lot of money. It is actually more than Mexico’s GNP. Now at first glance those numbers may seem crazy, but bear with me. Follow the math: when you deduct from their GNP the money sent back to Mexico each year from the illegal aliens working in the United States; take all the profits generated from the Mexican drug cartels, the one where the drugs come here, and our money goes there; take away the profit from the kidnap and ransom industry of Mexico; and then finally take away the profit from the coyote smuggling of illegals into America industry, that leaves Mexico with around 137 thousand dollars in adjusted GNP. Far less than Barack has raised.

My problem is with the way Barack has spent his campaign money so far. Very un-Socialistic of him, methinks.

Lets look at the breakdown of the candidates in the race and the money they’ve raised. Obama, Socialist Party, $603,000,000–Chuck Baldwin, Constitutional Party, $204,000–Bob Barr, Libertarian, $1,000.000–John McCain, Republican Party, $358,000,000–Cynthia McKinney, Green Party, $Zero$–and Ralph Nader, Independent, $3,000,000.

Do you see the problem here? Is there a pattern of selfishness? Do you smell capitalism? I do.

Let’s view the presidential candidates that are left in the race as a microcosm of American society according to their income: Barack would be the rich capitalist; McCain would be the upper-Middle Class; Nader and Barr would be the Middle-Class; Chuck Baldwin would be the working class; and finally poor ol’ cerebrally defective Cynthia McKinney would represent the welfare class with zero income.

Now my problem is: Why does Barack not spread the wealth around? He would certainly not be punishing himself. Why can’t he make sure all the candidates behind him have a chance for success too? Why does he not realize that if the candidates on the bottom have money, it will trickle up to him? Spread it around Barack, and it will be good for everybody.

It’s a little hard to give up something you worked for, isn’t it, Obama?

Posted to Satire | Comments (1) | Email This Post | Tags: Barack Obama, Socialist