Obama Calls Palin a Pig, a Fish, and Says She Stinks

Since John McCain chose Sarah Palin as his Vice Presidential running mate, the Democrats have reacted by flooring the accelerator and tossing the steering wheel out the window in their carriage of hate. The left has been in absolute chaos, disorganization, and panic–they have also become infected with a mob mentality. Adding more propulsion to the left’s misguided meanderings was a substantial drop in the polls for Obama, and a significant rise for McCain –with the coveted independents and women voters. They are leaving Obama en-mass. Obama still has time, with 55 days left, to recover.  But can he, with the direction he has chosen, and the media that had propped him up being the primary catalyst in alienating of voters? Obama, et al, have accelerated, and increased the very cause of their recent demise–hatefulness.

Obama has had a free ride with the press.  Since they created him, they have been huffing, puffing, and blowing wind into his sail.  But having a relationship with the press is a double edged sword, and as with most double edged swords, the opposing edge can be much sharper.

To make matters worse, Obama made a comment during a recent speech stating, “You can put lipstick on a pig, but it’s still a pig. You can wrap an old fish in a piece of paper called change, it’s still going to stink.”

Obama, when unscripted, and Biden, at anytime, seem to be predisposed to jam their feet into their mouths at the most inappropriate time. But this past week, with all the Palin hoopla in the press, and the backlash against the media for their unwarranted and uncivilized attacks on Palin, the pig and lipstick remark was especially inopportune.

Before addressing the Obama pig remark, let’s examine a remark made by Biden this week concerning Palin. When asked by a local Milwaukee reporter if Palin being elected as Vice President would be a step forward for women, Biden responded that if Sarah Palin becomes Vice President, it will be a “backward step for women.” Biden and Obama seemed to be in sync with their self inflicted alienation of voters.

Did Obama actually mean that Sarah Palin was a pig? Did he mean that she stinks? In fairness to Obama, probably not, but there is more–Obama’s statement coupled with Biden’s statement about a “backward step for women,” runs deeper than Sarah Palin—he essentially called all successful women with conservative principles, pigs.

This is Obama, unscripted, displaying his unparalleled display of diplomatic prowess.  The diplomatic skills that will neutralized an aggressive Iran, Russia, North Korea, etc., or not. It demonstrates their view of strong and successful women–especially if the women do not subscribe to the empty values of the Democrat Party which have de-evolved into a socialist aggregation void of values, morals, and principles. Obama’s allegorical use of a pig and fish was foolish, and enlightening. The pig, the fish, and the smell was directed at all successful women who have achieved something of greatness, while at the same time raising a family and sticking to a code of morals and principles. The same holds true with the Biden remark. It is a step backwards for women because Sarah Palin is not a left-wing liberal. She has achieved, even if not elected, what feminists have been trying to achieve for over a century–yet they attack her. The reason for their venom is that she is guided by morals.

To reciprocate and call Obama a pig would be inaccurate, as pigs do not have sweat glands–and Obama is sweating.

Leave a Reply