The two remaining Republican presidential candidates, Mike Huckabee and John McCain, and the two remaining Democrat presidential candidates, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, at this stage of the nominating process can be viewed as allegorical card games. Huckabee and McCain are playing Old Maid. Clinton and Obama are playing a malodorously public game of strip poker.
A candidate’s spouse cannot ensure an election win, but they can certainly ensure a loss.
Presidential spouses generally fall into two categories: The elected official by proxy, i.e. Hillary Clinton national policy maker, and the demurely, staid and proper role of the First Lady. Not to disparage the non-policy making spouses, but they did not campaign, were not elected, and continued their preceding roles within their families along with the customary duties of First Lady with dignity.
John McCain has a new add depicting himself as the Democrats worst nightmare. The ad proclaims that the Democrats fear facing him in the general election if he gets the nomination.
The McCain campaign Communications Director Jill Hazelbaker stated in the new ad that, “Democrat Senators, Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and John Edwards mentioned John McCain’s name 15 times during a 90 minute debate. Thus making McCain their worst nightmare.
Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton and Barack Obama have been fighting over Martin Luther King, Jr. like junk yard dogs over a bone. No disrespect to Rev. King for the bone reference, but much disrespect to Hillary and Bill for their insincere pandering efforts. Obama, in his defense, has only pointed out their invocation and predatory self serving rhetoric concerning Rev. King, albeit using the situation to convert Black voters.
The Clinton Campaign announced today they plan on filing a lawsuit against Barack Obama and his campaign. They will also be seeking an injunction early Monday morning to prevent him from following through with his scheduled interviews the day before the Michigan primary.
The Clinton campaign became suspicious immediately following Hillary’s unexpected win in New Hampshire. The Clinton Machine was made aware that Obama hired a couple of heavy hitting consultants for his campaign staff.
“The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter.”
— Winston Churchill
A better title, rather than “Who Voted For Hillary Clinton In Iowa? might be “Who Did Not Vote For Hillary Clinton In Iowa?
Hillary Clinton had the opportunity to make a concession speech for her third place finish behind Obama and Edwards that would have been the antithesis to Sally Field’s Oscar winning speech: “You don’t like me. You really, really, really don’t like me.” She would, of course, be referring to the women voters of Iowa.
The Hillary Clinton Machine continues to tout the experience that would make her the most qualified candidate over her inadequately qualified competitors vying for the Democrat presidential nomination. Yet she has rarely spoken, other than generalities, of any specific qualifications she has acquired in her storied career that make her the most qualified.
Oscar de la Hoya vs. Felix Trinidad. A world championship boxing match. Oscar de la Hoya dominated the fight up until the final few rounds at which point he had enough points to secure the win if he continued to fight with the same aggressiveness that had secured his dominance throughout the bout. His corner, believing the fight was in the bag and not wanting to take any chances, advised Oscar to dance around the final few rounds and avoid engaging Trinidad. While Oscar refused to fight, Trinidad fought. He continued to score points while Oscar avoided engagement. Trinidad won the fight. Moral: If you have a winning game plan, stick with it until the end. Many a contest has been lost by the changing of momentum.
DNA Discoverer: Blacks Less Intelligent Than Whites
One of the world’s most eminent scientists has created a racial firestorm in Britain.
James D. Watson, 79, co-discoverer of the DNA helix and winner of the 1962 Nobel Prize in medicine, told the Sunday Times of London that he was “inherently gloomy about the prospect of Africa” because “all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours – whereas all the testing says not really.”
He recognized that the prevailing belief was that all human groups are equal, but that “people who have to deal with black employees find this not true.”
Acknowledging that the issue was a “hot potato,” the lifelong Democrat and avowed secular humanist nonetheless said his beliefs were not an excuse to discriminate against blacks.
There is an age old argument of whether you are a product of your genetics or your environment. One theory presumes your behavior, intelligence and personality are the direct result of the genes you inherited. The other theory presumes your behavior, intelligence and personality are the direct result of your environment. Analogous to predestination vis a vis free will.
I intend to prove, with irrefutable evidence, that one’s behavior, intelligence and personality are the direct result of one’s environment. I will produce clinical laboratory confirmation in the ensuing discourse.
Comments (1)