Why I Am Voting For John McCain
Every four years the United States has a presidential election. Each election cycle generally presents a unique reason, or reasons, for the public to vote for one candidate or another. It may be a one issue vote, such as taxes, the economy, health care, national security, or ideology. This coming presidential election is categorically different. The American people have been presented with two choices for president. One being a semi-conservative, and quasi-Republican John McCain, and the other being a consummate Socialist, Marxist– terms of endearment vis-a-vis Obama’s categorical definition: Democratic anarchist.
John McCain’s patriotism has been tested, and tested hard. There is no unknown as to how McCain would handle a crisis. He would not be found under his desk curled up in the fetal position. Politics aside, it would be intellectually disingenuous for someone to either state, or believe, he would have the capacity to fold under pressure.
Barack Obama on the other hand wants to be the Commander in Chief of these United States, when in actuality, and sans his position as a U.S. Senator, had he applied for a job that required the highest level security clearance, it is plausible that he would be denied due to his radical alliances with terrorists, felons, and anti-American pulpiteers. Obama has never been tested, never lead, and it would be intellectually disingenuous to state with authority that he would not curl up in the fetal position, metaphorically speaking, in a time of crisis.
This election cycle presents not only an American economy, but a world economy, that is teetering on the brink of a recession, rogue nations in possession of, or rapidly acquiring or manufacturing nuclear weapons, possible four Supreme Court appointments in the next four years, and another assault on the United States and its allies by Islamic terrorists. These are the issues the next President will face. The next President’s leadership, and the Congress, will determine the dénouement in regard to these issues in the ensuing next four years. Come November the fourth, this, whether the voter is aware of the aggregate of the issues listed above, is what the vote is about. Not the redundant and ridiculous mantra of change, or the same ridiculous mantra of four more years of Bush. Those are irrelevant, sophomoric, and dangerously inept reasons to cast a vote for Obama on November the fourth.
Sometimes a vote is a vote to salvage the soul of a country. A soul that has been chipped away for the past thirty years by the ever increasing radical left’s influence in politics and the courts. Europe has lost its soul. It was not taken in war, sold on the market, or wrenched away in some Machiavellian conspirative, but just given up with the same defeatist modus that Obama, Pelosi, and Reid espouse. For the sake of salvaging the soul of this country, I am voting for John McCain for four reasons only: The economy, national security, judgment, and the Supreme Court. The arguments are as follows:
The Economy: If elected to the presidency, and if the Democrats in Congress increase their position to a super-majority, an all out assault against capitalism in this country can be expected. Some variation of the economy from 1929-1945 can also be expected. Obama will increase taxes on the very entities that create the jobs in this country, which will in turn result in a significant loss of jobs and benefits. Obama’s statement to Joe the Plumber: “It’s not that I want to punish your success. I just want to make sure that everybody who is behind you, that they’ve got a chance for success too. My attitude is that if the economy’s good for folks from the bottom up, it’s gonna be good for everybody … I think when you spread the wealth around, it’s good for everybody.” This should give even the most casual observer an idea of where the economy will be headed.
But a more ominous problem faces the economy if Obama is elected and the Democrats can muster up a filibuster-proof majority, The world economic crisis, the very one that can be attributed to a handful of Democrats in the Congress and their defective ideology, the very ones who have the most blood on their hands from their culpability in the current crisis, will be in charge of the banks, Wall Street, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, etc. To calculate the consequences of that scenario, one would only need to possess a modicum of common sense.
John McCain cannot fix the economy. The economy, other than the proper dispensing of the seven hundred billion dollars by Paulson, is at a point where it can only sort itself out. But Obama, and Congress, can significantly magnify and perpetuate a painfully prolonged experience.
The Supreme Court: Obama has made it very clear that he does not like the disposition of the United States, and has a rabid disdain for the U.S. Constitution that is the foundation of this country, and was the driving force behind making it the greatest, most prosperous, and the most powerful country on this planet. He believes ,as did FDR, that the Supreme Court is a tool to be manipulated by the Executive Branch to recast the foundation of this country in a mold of how he perceives it should have been to start with. When speaking of the Supreme Court, and especially the Warren Court, the most radical court in U.S. history, Obama had this to say about the role of the Supreme Court:
“The Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth, and of more basic issues such as political and economic justice in society. To that extent, as radical as I think people try to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn’t that radical. It didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the founding fathers in the Constitution, at least as its been interpreted and Warren Court interpreted in the same way, that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. What the states can’t do to you. Says what the Federal government can’t do to you, but doesn’t say what the Federal government or State government must do on your behalf, and that hasn’t shifted and one of the, I think, tragedies of the civil rights movement was, um, because the civil rights movement became so court focused I think there was a tendency to lose track of the political and community organizing and activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalition of powers through which you bring about redistributive change. In some ways we still suffer from that.”
As I have stated many times before, for someone who has a law degree, and taught Constitutional Law, Barack Obama has continually displayed an unparalleled and profound ignorance of the Constitution and U.S. history. He also does not understand the role of the Supreme Court, as set up by the Founding Fathers, as witnessed in this statement by him as to what he believes the role of the Supreme Court should be:
“I taught constitutional law for 10 years, and . . . when you look at what makes a great Supreme Court justice, it’s not just the particular issue and how they rule, but it’s their conception of the Court. And part of the role of the Court is that it is going to protect people who may be vulnerable in the political process, the outsider, the minority, those who are vulnerable, those who don’t have a lot of clout.
“Sometimes we’re only looking at academics or people who’ve been in the lower court. If we can find people who have life experience and they understand what it means to be on the outside, what it means to have the system not work for them, that’s the kind of person I want on the Supreme Court.”
“We need somebody who’s got the heart, the empathy, to recognize what it’s like to be a young teenage mom. The empathy to understand what it’s like to be poor, or African-American, or gay, or disabled, or old. And that’s the criteria by which I’m going to be selecting my judges.”
Obama’s ignorance of the Supreme Court is absolutely astounding.
Even though John McCain did bruise the tenets of the 1st Amendment with the McCain-Fiengold Act, an act that I hold to be unconstitutional, yet an appointment of a constructionist to the bench can be expected if he is elected . But if left unchecked, with a Democrat controlled Congress, Obama will put in motion a chain reaction that will systematically dismantle the very Constitution that made this country what it is. Can you live with that? Will you live with that? Can the country survive that?
National Security: The dissection of national security, in regard to the two candidates, needs to be broken down into two factions, first being the threat of terrorism domestically, and second being the general security of this nation.
Concerning domestic terrorism, such as 9/11, as with George Bush, McCain will be a failure. McCain is a reckless illiterate in regard to his advocating open borders and amnesty for illegals. It can’t be made any clearer than that. On September 11th we were attacked on our soil by terrorists that were in our country illegally. Seven years later, our borders are as porous as they were on that day and there are still 15-25 million people in this country that the government does not know the identity of. There are, at any given time, 600,000 unaccounted for criminal and visa violating aliens in this country–just as the terrorists were who flew the planes into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, and Pennsylvania. Seven years and nothing has changed. A very comforting feeling and the possibility of either candidate changing it is nil.
General National Security with Obama as Commander in Chief leaves no room for his voting “present”, ducking the issue, playing coy by being nuanced, or hiding behind the media’s protective coattails. Obama has zero record of leadership and has demonstrated no quantifiable skills in leadership. A person is either a leader or not and it is apparent in any endeavor they pursue. Obama has never risen to any occasion, not once. Obama has a very dangerous and naive view of the world we live in.
Joe Biden summed it up best:
“Mark my words. It will not be six months before the world tests Barack Obama like they did John Kennedy. The world is looking.”
“Remember I said it standing here. if you don’t remember anything else I said. Watch, we’re gonna have an international crisis, a generated crisis, to test the mettle of this guy. And he’s gonna have to make some really tough — I don’t know what the decision’s gonna be, but I promise you it will occur. As a student of history and having served with seven presidents, I guarantee you it’s gonna happen.”
If tested, and tested hard, do you, first, want to take a chance on someone with such a perception of weakness as to guarantee a test for this country, and second, if tested hard, there will be one winner and one loser–is that a chance you are willing to take by voting for Obama? Do you want to play that game?
Barack Obama will emaciate the military of this country. He has stated he will dismantle the Missile Defense Shield at a time when Russia, who, incidentally, has approximately twice the nuclear arsenal of the U.S., is flexing its imperialistic muscle. North Korea is continually working on becoming nuclear; Iran, while thumbing its nose at the world, is steadfastly working towards nuclear weaponry; and Communist China is continually increasing its military budget to front a very formidable nuclear military. While Obama wants to regressively shift this country’s national security, Barney Frank, D-Mass., and Congress have stated they will accommodate Obama by contributing to the emaciating process via a 25 percent cut in military spending,saying the Pentagon has to start choosing from its many weapons programs.
Judgment: Obama, if elected, will have the opportunity to make over 1000 appointments from the Supreme Court on down. He has a long history of making very poor judgments in regard to his associations. To exercise sound judgment, one must have a balance of intelligence and virtue. Aristotle, in his work, Nicomachean Ethics, speaks about the five intellectual virtues of knowledge, art, prudence, intuition, and wisdom. Counter to what Obama apologists want to believe, Obama has not demonstrated the possession of any of the five virtues of knowledge beyond a rudimentary level, though having myriad opportunities in his life to do so, thus making his past and future decision making anemically problematic.
Aristotle takes the position that friends can be viewed as second selves. Obama has surrounded himself with the likes of William Ayers, Jeremiah Wright, Tony Rezko, Rashid Khalidi, Samantha Powers, and Acorn, etc. According to Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, there exists three types of friends. Friendships of utility, friendships of pleasure, and friendships of the good. Utility friendships are of convenience and gain, and are terminated when the usefulness of the friendship has run its course. This seems to be the type of friendships that Obama has cultivated throughout his life. Such was the ease that Obama discarded Rezko, Wright, et al, and has tried to downplay his relationship with Ayers.
The friendship of the good is a combination of like character and a mutual affection for each other’s company. This would be true friendship. This is a void that is apparent with Obama. There has not been a person of the stature of a true time tested friend to stand up for Obama–no one from his childhood, university, or early career had appeared beside him for support. He has only been flanked by supporters and people of a utility nature in his life. He also does not seem to have developed any friendships of pleasure where there would be a general accommodating attraction. Contrast this to McCain, who has a very long list of distinguished true friends dating back to the time of his imprisonment in Viet Nam while serving his country. As there was not a lot of time to be doing community organizing and associating with radicals while lying in a prison cell with broken limbs and refusing to be released until soldiers with a longer tenure in the prison were released first, he forged time tested friendships based upon mutual respect.
The Democrat Party has de-evolved into an uncivilized, and feral cult with an inordinate amount of political clout to possess such a destructive ideology. If you truly believe that the dismantling of the Constitution, a long and painful recession, and being vulnerable to any one of the above enumerated rogue countries is the change this country needs, then by all means vote for Obama, but I will vote for McCain–which will be a vote for America’s soul.
Comments (8) | Email This Post
| Tags: Barack Obama, John McCain, Supreme Court 
Your comment about the Supreme Court under Obama is exactly right.
I might add that one ought to always beware when a politician talks about skewing the judicial system to help out the “little guy” or another “victim”. What they are talking about is warping or destroying the Rule of Law to favor one party over another.
And what that politician forgets (or never knew in the first place) is that it is only because of the Rule of Law that the “little guy” has a chance in the first place. It is the Rule of Law that gives legitimacy to the result if the “little guy” in fact prevails in court. Without that legitimacy, judgments of courts can and will be simply ignored.
And without the legitimacy of the Rule of Law, the only thing that matters is Power. Whenever the “little guy” runs up against someone else who has a better connection with Obama or the judge or whoever is pulling the strings (can you say ACORN?), that “little guy” will lose even if the Law is on his side. There would then be no more Rule of Law.
Just the way Obama wants it.
Obama is dangerous person. he tried and failed in Illinois to allow “oral instructions” from poll workers in the voting booth. This is a fancy way of saying allowing union and other politcal machine thugs to intimidate voters. Obama would strive to eliminate the privacy of voting.
I am finding the republican opposition to helping the “little guy” very interesting and enlightening. Obama does not want to “skew” the judicial system in favor of the little guys, who are, let’s be honest, socioeconomically disadvantaged, often minorites. It is a fact, that the judicial system has always favored those with power (money). It seems that McCain supporters are afraid of being served with the same spoon from which they have been feeding the middle and poor classes throughout U.S. history. It seems that is upsetting to the “big guys” who have always had the advantage.
You state that, “Obama will increase taxes on the very entities that create the jobs in this country.” Well thanks “big guys” for creating those jobs but you have received enough perks to last you a lifetime. How long do you expect to be repaid with “special privileges” that the rest of us are not privy to.
What have the republicans done except suffocate the American Dream. I agree wholeheartedly with Obama. Those whose income is above $250,000 a year can afford increased taxes. Do you think that anyone who graduates college and puts their heart and soul into working hard to support a family, only to earn $20,000 -$30,000 a year should be further penalized when they are already struggling to make ends meet.
I and alot of others I know, believe that many republicans are justifying their opposition to Obama’s ideas by using the Constitution, this war, and the current economic disaster (both of the later created by republicans). It seems they (you) can afford their (your) gas, energy, mortgage, college, and grocery bills and are not concerned with the plight of the rest of us. You’ve earned your money and plan to keep all of it, hunh?
I just have trouble understanding how republicans consider themselves conservative and Christian. Those two words in the same sentence is an oxymoron. So to those Christian, conservative, republicans who are against spreading the wealth amongst all the rest of us, review Matthew 19:24, Mark 10:25, and Luke 18:25 in your Bibles. “It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God.”
So, you tell me who is looking out for the best interests of our country. I wouldn’t want to be around when some of you “big guys” have to explain to Jesus Christ on Judgement Day why you hoarded more money than you could possibly spend in a lifetime (money that you didn’t deserve because you are no better than the rest of us) and lived lavishly, while others worked all their lives with nothing to show for it! Try justifying your actions to God by spouting all that nonsense and see where it gets you. And make sure and tell Jesus that you think his doctrine is Socialist and Marxist, that should really help.
I have to respond to “4 Fairness”. All I can say is put a sign up: No swimming in his gene pool! Wow! Where do I start? I know that as one of those evil job creators, the streets are paved with gold for me!
And as for the judicial system being against the “little guy”, I can speak for Blacks, and say that the judicial system has been skewed, particularly in the past. But you are stuck in the past, my friend. And regardless, the rule of law reigns supreme. It is indeed a “one size fits all”. Do people fall through the cracks, sure, but such is life. You liberal idealist really believe you can create this Polyanna world.
The beauty of America is that you can choose your stage in life. Nobody is putting a gun to your head saying “succeed” or “fail” in your case. YOU choose! Not McCain. Obama wants you to fail, because he knows there are those among us willing to carry a few of your lazy butts. We are just built that way. I know I awake every morning, and do a roll call on the 20 or so malcontented able-bodied unemployed to make sure that they have an adequate supply of “smokes” and liquor, as I head off to hold some peion’s nose to the grindstone.
And for a Democrat to invoke God, well that is “rich”. Is this a prison conversion, because last time I checked, you folks were removing God from everything? And to quote scripture, no less! Honestly, I am done with you, as I could lambaste you, filet you, and serve you up, but you likely wouldn’t get it. But I will leave you with this. I am glad that a great American, John McCain was willing to have his shoulders and arms broken to allow you to attend a government school, so that you could show how truly ignorant you are.
That’s just part of my rant!
fairness,
You made your life, if you don’t like it then remake it. Don’t think the government penalizing anyone will help you. Rivers don’t flow up hill, sorry.
Was Devry all you hoped it would be?
@ 4 fairness:
Here’s Obama: “We need somebody who’s got the heart, the empathy, to recognize what it’s like to be a young teenage mom, the empathy to understand what it’s like to be poor or African-American or gay or disabled or old—and that’s the criterion by which I’ll be selecting my judges.”
What does this mean? Where does heart and empathy come into the equation? How does membership in any of these victims’ groups matter to someone interpreting the Rule of Law, except to skew it? (Imagine one party in a lawsuit being right on the facts, and right on the law, but losing the case because of the identity of the other party.) And where does Obama’s test come into the equation in selecting judges, except to select those who are willing to skew the Rule of Law to help the “right” victims?
Either Obama’s statement is meaningless, or it shows that the judges that Obama picks will be those who will manipulate the law to find the “right” result.
Remember the old statue of Lady Justice? She’s blindfolded. For a reason. If her blindfold comes off, then right and wrong no longer matter — only power will matter.
Dearest 4 Fairness,
At first glance, I thought your comment was the work of a genius satirist, but on second inspection, I realized it was the sincere work of a garden variety parasite.
I usually do not allow comments that are not relevant or are ridiculously inept in content. But I do like to read opposing views that are intelligently assembled. I am going to make an exception in your case. You have breached the boundaries of ignorance with your comment in myriad facets. You have, as is typical with someone infected with a chronic affliction of ignorance, made assumptions, conjectures, and characterizations without an ounce of substantiation or intelligence.
I assume that you are referring to the Supreme Court when you use the term judicial system, since that is the only court reference I used. So, I beg you, list one court case where the Supreme Court favored someone with money. Produce some record of a systematic process of SCOTUS favoring the wealthy? Who are the “big guys” you are referring to? Clarify for me please, if you can. I really want to know since you are lumping me into the “big guy” category and I consider myself rather svelte.
Again, who are the “big guys” that you acknowledge are creating the jobs? Is it a small business owner barely keeping his head above water supporting 20-50 employees? What perks are you referring to that a business owner with a few employees received that will last them a lifetime? Who are you referring to? What are the “special privileges” you are referring to that are being repaid? Who are you referring to that is not privy to these “special privileges”? Tell me why I was left out of the loop of a lifetime of perks? Tell me who I can complain to?
Show me the statistics that support the fact that everyone who makes over $250,000 can afford increased taxes. What is your source of information? I think that if someone graduates college, and I assume you are referring to yourself, and they put their heart and soul into working to support a family, and are only earning 20-30k per year, I would suggest looking into filing a lawsuit against the university for fraud for graduating them, patting them on the head and sending them out into the world believing they were educated. Please, explain how they are being penalized when having a family at that income allows them to pay zero taxes. Where is the penalty? I consider it a crime that no taxes are being paid.
So you believe that this war, and the current economic disaster were created by the Republicans? How many Democrats voted for the war in Congress? How many Democrats opposed Bush and McCain’s attempt to avert the Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac meltdown in 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008 that caused this crisis? All the Democrats opposed it and killed it in committee and prevented it from a vote on the floor where it would have passed.
You state that they (you), meaning me, can afford their (your), me again, gas, energy, mortgage, college, and grocery bills and are (me included) not concerned with the plight of the rest of us. Do you know me? Do you have access to my financials? How do you know I have earned my money? And if I have earned my money, why should I give it to you? Would it be fair if you just gave me your address and I just mailed you a check? Would that shut you up? Only until you wasted the money and started crying for more. How much should I make the amount out for? What would be a fair amount to give you? Do you know my thoughts about the “rest of you”? And who are the rest of you? Who are you referring to? Is it ignorant people? Is it poor people? Is it liberals? Who are the rest of you and what sets you apart from me? I am just going have to take a shot in the dark and go with ignorant people. So explain to me how someone of the stature of ” the rest of us” has contributed to this country? Other than sucking the life blood out of this country, where is the contribution? After all, Joe Biden said that to pay taxes is patriotic, what does it mean to not pay taxes? I am not being accusatory, just curious. What is your personal contribution to this country?
You have trouble understanding how republicans (sic) consider themselves conservative and Christian. You find it to be an oxymoron for those two words to be in the same sentence. What two words? You listed three. Are you ignorant of math also? So conservative, Christian republicans (sic) are against spreading the wealth amongst the rest of us? Again, you is “the rest of us” that you keep referring to? I don’t need to review Matthew 19:24 because I know it. Apparently you don’t. “It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God.” Are you saying that all rich people are going to hell? Theologically speaking, you are an idiot. That phrase is the hyperbolic teaching that Jesus used to make his point. This particular passage illustrated the fact that salvation is impossible with man. The rich he was referring to can be found in Ezekiel 14:3.7: Whatever a man’s heart is in is what a man’s god is. All people are rich in God’s eyes who posses something they love and are unwilling to forsake it for God. A wealthy person may have more of a challenge than most, but there is nothing on this earth that can determine someone’s fate.
You state that you would not want to be there when “you big guys” have to explain to Jesus Christ on Judgment day why more money was hoarded than could be spent, “money that was not deserved because you are not better than the rest.” Again, who the hell are you people? I am having trouble wrapping my head around this statement because of its stupidity, but here goes. You don’t want to be there on Judgment Day, but I do, at least sitting in the peanut gallery, when the “rest of you”, whatever the hell that means, are explaining to Jesus, with blood on your soiled soul, how you supported splitting open the skull of a late term infant with a pair of scissors and sucking the child’s brain out, just moments before it is to be born. You are just as culpable as the doctor committing this act by voting for an infanticidal maniac of a politician, then going to church on Sunday and shouting hallelujah, praise the Lord, and to hell with the Republicans for not giving me more money.
The only fatal flaw I see in the Constitution is a provision that would prevent a person, such as yourself, from voting because of their unprecedented ignorance.
4 Fairness, you are a blood sucking parasite, and rather than continue on and on about your ignorance and hypocrisy, how about I answer your statement about the republicans (sic) suffocating the American Dream and subject you to what the American Dream:
“We do not choose to be born. We do not choose our parents. We do not choose our historical epoch, or the country of our birth, or the immediate circumstances of our upbringing. We do not, most of us, choose to die; nor do we choose the time or conditions of our death. But within all this realm of choicelessness, we do choose how we shall live: courageously or in cowardice, honorably or dishonorably, with purpose or adrift. We decide what is important and what is trivial in life. We decide that what makes us significant is either what we do or what we refuse to do. But no matter how indifferent the universe may be to our choices and decisions, these choices and decisions are ours to make. We decide. We choose. And as we decide and choose, so are our lives formed. In the end, forming our own destiny is what ambition is about.” by Joseph Epstein.
With more than 10 hours to go before the actual election gets underway, im struck with thoughts about what happens afterword.
I have been a republican ever since I have been able to vote. I had the opportunity to spend some time in Washington DC and work in our federal government and it gave me some perspective. I don’t claim to know more than anyone else and the only idea that is ingrained into my being is that it is good to help people.
I consider myself a Buchananite-Paleo-Conservative, I believe in the constitution, I am of the mind that people should chart their lives and live according to their means. I recognize that for the past 8 years we have had a “Conservative” Republican in office. He has ruined the economy, the constitution, the country, and how we Americans view each other. I do not support John McCain, I will not vote for Barack Obama.
So here we are, we need change, the media and our elite class of people will not tell us who else is available for us to vote for. I want an American, not some gimmick! I’m pissed off and I’m not going to take it anymore! WE LIVE IN A POLICE STATE! The things that hold us together are gone, were being ripped apart and I don’t like it. I see videos on YouTube of people who make offensive comments, I see stories of all this nonsense that is irrelevant to the office of the president. I don’t care about any of it. I don’t want to know where they stand on health care, I don’t care about what they will do for the economy, I don’t want to know about any of the social programs they have coming down the pike. I want to know who will uphold the constitution. Who will get us out of: Iraq, NATO, The Law of the Sea Treaty, the UN, The WHO, NAFTA, GATT, CAFTA, the federal reserve system, repeal any and all tax laws, the SPP, and any other world organization. I am no xenophobe or conspiracy nut, I am an individual who recognizes when things aren’t right. Something isn’t right here people.
I am from a small town in New York State, I was raised with Hispanics, Blacks, Whites, Arabs, Indians, and Asians. We never hated each other, we didn’t always get along but it was never what I am seeing now. I see Blacks seething, I see whites on the brink. Who cares about these two liars anyway, is this that important?
If Roe v Wade is so important lets legislate it! Supreme Court Justices shouldn’t be legislating from the bench. They are chosen to interpret the Constitution. Is it taxes? Taxes were instituted to help pay for a war. Let’s repeal them altogether or institute a flat fair tax, on income or goods, not both! The government has enough money, it prints it out of thin air, why do they need our money? It can’t be the economy! We have a socialist in office now! He just purchased a large share of banking organizations for the United States taxpayer. WE ARE LIVING THE NIGHTMARE!
If you’re voting for Obama: no one can even validate the mans citizenship, more than that, he’s saying a lot but can he deliver?
If you’re voting for McCain: Did you forget? This guy offered up amnesty with the democrats! You mean to tell me he’s changed his mind?
Damn Barack Obama, Damn John McCain! I want everyone to know I don’t care about either of them. I am American, first, last, and always! Lets be that again, together!